Menu

How fast could you run the next one?

Turn one recent race into finish times and training paces from one mile to 50K.
  • 1 min
  • You bring: one race time
  • Free, nothing saved
Compare the standard formula with the steeper fade implied by 22,422 Garmin prediction-days. No account and nothing saved.

Your result

Use a recent race or all-out time trial.

Live
1. Distance
2. Finish time
3. Pace unit

Predictions

One result, two curves.

The second curve applies the steeper fade implied by our Garmin dataset. It is a comparison, not a promise.

Distance / paceTextbookGarmin-implied
  1. 1 mile4:02 /km6:295:42
  2. 5K4:19 /km21:3520:33
  3. 10KInput4:30 /km45:0045:00
  4. Half marathon4:42 /km1:39:171:44:42+5:24
  5. Marathon4:54 /km3:27:013:49:17+22:17
  6. 50K4:57 /km4:07:494:37:49+30:00
What is the difference between the curves?

Textbook uses Riegel's 1.06 exponent. Garmin-implied uses 1.131, the median fade in 22,422 prediction-days. It describes what those watches assumed, not a proven physiological truth.

Training paces

From your estimated 5K fitness

  1. Easy / long runConversational, 75–80% of weekly volume5:32 /km
  2. Marathon paceSlightly slower than threshold4:58 /km
  3. Tempo / thresholdComfortably hard, 20–40 min4:37 /km
  4. 10K paceHard, sustainable for 30–50 min4:27 /km
  5. 5K / intervalRace effort, 3–5 min repeats4:19 /km
  6. VO2 max / repetition1500m–mile pace, short intervals4:03 /km

Why two answers?

Distance exposes the assumption.

Both curves start from the same race. They differ only in how quickly they expect you to slow as distance grows. Nearby distances are usually more useful than large jumps.

Read the full method

1.06

Textbook exponent

Riegel, published in 1977

1.131

Garmin-implied median

85 athletes, one cohort

Useful limits

Before you trust the number

How accurate is a race pace predictor?

It depends almost entirely on how far you extrapolate. Between neighbouring distances (10K to half marathon) the Riegel formula holds up well. Across a big jump — 5K to marathon — it gets optimistic, and our own data says systematically so: across 22,422 daily Garmin predictions, every single athlete in our cohort implied a steeper slowdown than Riegel assumes, median 1.131 against his 1.06. That is why this calculator shows both curves instead of pretending there is one answer.

What is the Riegel formula?

Peter Riegel's 1977 formula: T2 = T1 × (D2 / D1)^1.06. The 1.06 exponent accounts for the fact that you slow down slightly per kilometer over longer races. It remains one of the most widely used and tested race predictors despite being almost 50 years old.

Can I use a treadmill or training run as input?

Only if it was a maximal effort over the stated distance. Race performance reflects pacing, fueling, and mental effort that regular training runs don't. Time trials and races are what the formula is designed for.

Why are my training paces different from what this predicts?

Training paces here are based on your current race fitness. If you train harder or easier than these paces feel, trust how you feel over the formula. These paces assume healthy recovery; in a high-stress week, easy pace should drift 15–20 seconds slower.

Does this work for trail or ultra running?

Not directly. Riegel assumes flat, consistent terrain. For trail races, add 10–30% to the predicted time depending on elevation gain and technicality. Ultras (50+ miles) break the formula entirely — fueling and pacing dominate.

Should I trust this or my Garmin race predictor?

They are answering slightly different questions. Garmin works from your actual training — VO2 max trend, recent paces, lactate threshold — while this works from one race result. The interesting part is that they disagree in a consistent direction: we measured the fade Garmin builds in and it is steeper than the textbook formula for every athlete we looked at. In 11 real races where we had a prediction from the day before, Garmin came within a median of 0.6%. Eleven races is a case series, not proof, but it is the only direct evidence we have and it does not favour the textbook.

Training for a race?

One useful note each month on pacing, readiness and recovery. No feed to keep up with.